PDA

View Full Version : Porsche Carrera GT- Test


NewsReporter
04-13-2004, 05:49 AM
http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0412/porschemain.jpg

2004 PORSCHE CARRERA GT
ON SALE: Now
PRICE: $440,000
POWERTRAIN: Mid-engine, 5.7-liter/350-cid dohc V10;
605 hp @ 8000 rpm, 435 lb-ft @ 5750 rpm; six-speed manual
CURB WEIGHT: 3043 pounds
TRACK TEST DATA: SEE BELOW

THE FIRST HURDLE is the language barrier. Not the one between technical German and English—any part of the Carrera GT experience that does not translate can be communicated through a combination of hand gestures and low, appreciative whistling.

No, the problem comes with the growing realization that “supercar” isn’t going to be a strong enough word for us here, as there is a magnitude of difference between this
über Porsche and other more, well, ordinary supercars. The Carrera GT could eat any production Lamborghini for breakfast, spend the morning snacking on Aston Martins and then lunch on Ferraris. What we need here is new nomenclature, something understated, yet snappy. How about hyper-ultimate megacar?

http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0412/porscheengine.jpg

Which leads to question No. 1: How hyper, ultimate and mega is the Carrera GT? That’s what we’re here to find out, at the grandly titled Adria International Raceway, approximately 50 miles from Venice in Italy. As the first U.S. magazine to run and publish a full test of the $440,000 roadster, our mission is to gather as full a set of performance figures as the track here will allow. There is not enough space to mount a challenge on Porsche’s claimed 205-mph top speed, but we should be in a position to confirm, deny or possibly even better the company’s claim to a 3.7-second 0-to-62-mph (100 km/h) time.

First up, some acquaintance-making. Seen in the otherwise empty, concrete surrounds of the Adria pit lane, the two Carrera GTs on hand both look low, mean, hungry and gleaming with a slightly predatory malevolence. The front end comes across as scaled-up stock Porsche on first acquaintance, but look harder and you see some real hard man-menace in the slant and set of the headlights’ gaze. First choice: red or silver. The Italian magazine that we are sharing the day with does not mind, so we opt for the silver car. It is definitely the GT’s color (half of the production will be finished in it). And the silver car here also does without the no-cost optional a/c and stereo that most will ship with; every bit of weight saved should translate as performance gained when it comes to getting figures. Best of all, our decoding of the VIN suggests it is the first U.S.-spec car: If you see a red car in other magazines, know that it is European specification. There is no significant difference that we’ve been made aware of, but the car we tested was definitely meant for America. Far cry from Porsche’s 959, eh?

Before we start, let’s look at just what we’re going to start. The rear clamshell hood opens on an immaculately presented engine bay, every pipe clipped just so, suspension wishbones and rocker-operated springs and dampers polished to a near-concours shine.

http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0412/porschespeedo.jpg

(The car has not been specially prepared, engineering project leader Michael Hölscher tells us; this is how they all leave the factory.) The bay is dominated by a sturdy-looking carbon fiber yoke to which the engine and suspension are bolted and which is then attached to the chassis tub.

It is in the heart of this, surrounded by its webbed protection, that the star of the show sits, the 5.7-liter, quad-cam 40-valve V10.

Lots of road cars claim racing provenance for their engines; this is very much the real deal. The 68-degree banked motor was originally designed to power Porsche’s proposed LMP2000 Le Mans racer by ex-Formula One engine man Herbert Ampferer. To the dismay of the engineers at Porsche’s Weissach R&D facility, the LMP2000 project was pulled in November ’99 to concentrate engineering resources on the Cayenne, and instead of racing the engine Porsche chose to base the Carrera GT around it. Amazingly, it has made the transition to a production block largely unchanged. Quieter chain-driven cams have replaced the original gear-driven ones, bringing Porsche’s Variocam inlet timing adjustment with them. The engine now has to exhale through catalysts and has been slightly detuned for road use, but not by that much. The racer was reportedly set to make 680 hp at 10,000 rpm; the Carrera GT manages 605 hp at 8000 rpm, in conjunction with 435 lb-ft of torque. In a car weighing just 3043 pounds unladen, that is still more than plenty.

OUR FIRST BIT of driving is onto the local roads surrounding the circuit and into a couple of the neighboring towns for photography. It is also a good opportunity to conduct a quick poll on what the Italians make of this strange, silvery beast in their midst. The engine starts via a simple turn of the ignition key rather than through the sort of F-16 switch-and-button start procedure favored by some rivals. And apart from the towering center stack, complete with the wooden-handled gear change selector that defines the cabin, the design and finish are modest and restrained. Steering wheel and instruments are similar to those found in the current-generation 996, although the speedometer is calibrated to 225 mph. It takes awhile to realize the cabin is actually trimmed in unpainted carbon fiber, weave pattern clearly visible, set off by a few well-chosen leather panels and big, industrial-looking, floor-hinged alloy pedals.

http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0412/porschepedals.jpg

For slow-speed use the tiny twin-plate ceramic clutch requires some acclimatization, but the gearshift is a real joy to use, sliding cleanly between the gates, despite cable operation and the distance between the selector and the transmission behind the engine. Dial up 2000 rpm, let the clutch out very gently and we’re moving, heading out of the gates of Adria in nearly a half-million dollars worth of the finest German performance engineering.

On local streets the Carrera becomes effortless again. It is a big, wide car—and sitting low in the cockpit within the slightly too intimate embrace of the bucket seats (one-inch-wider ones are optional), it is relatively hard to accurately place the car’s front corners on the road. But otherwise this might as well be a Boxster or a stock 911 in terms of the demands it makes on the driver: going, stopping and steering like it is no big deal, engine happy to rumble along at low revs in high gears. It is so good at convincing you this is nothing special that it comes as a fresh surprise to see each face as it turns toward you, breaks into a grin, gives a thumbs-up or even shouts encouragement.

“Ferrari?” asks an old man at an intersection. No, not a Ferrari. He looks surpris-ed, maybe slightly offended that such an interloper could be traveling through his part of the world, but then he smiles broadly and his shoulders rise into an easily translated shrug: “Heck, it’s still pretty great.”

THE GT HANDLES local roads and local adulation, but it is not where we need to be for the proper dynamic interrogation. Before long we’re heading back in through the gatehouse at Adria and onto pit lane. The thick mist that covered the area early in the morning has gone, burned off by the rising sun. Track conditions are perfect: 66 degrees, clear skies, absolutely no wind.

Within the first couple of corners it is clear the GT is genuinely great, immediately at home in this environment. And the lack of scariness apparent on the road stays good on the track: It is benign, friendly and profoundly unsnappy, certainly on the generally slowish corners that make up Adria. The limits of adhesion are high, thanks to the road-roller profile of the vast Michelin tires. But the steering is as communicative as a Bud-fueled best buddy and throttle response is perfectly proportional. Within a short space of time—so short you should be amazed—it is possible to push the car hard, work the powerful ceramic brakes deep into the corners, trimming the line with the throttle. Scale up the sensation of driving a go-kart and you’ve got it, especially the instinctive sensation of weight transfer, helping the car to turn and grip and find its traction.

http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0412/porschetester.jpg

The issue of traction being where the traction control comes in. Traction control systems tend to bring out the machismo in most drivers. (“There’s no way a machine can do the job better than me!”) But with the Carrera GT, even one-time test pilot (and rally megastar) Walter Röhrl advised drivers to keep the electronic safeguards in place during even the hardest driving. With good reason, too. Unless you are Röhrl, you will almost certainly travel considerably quicker if you leave it activated and invest trust. Traction control off and the car gets skittish, sliding suddenly at the limit of
adhesion, power overwhelming the tires’ high lateral limits all the way up to seriously high speeds. But left on, traction manage- ment is a friendly system, engineered to stay in the background for as long as possible, intervening only as adhesion is lost, reining in the engine’s efforts with sensitivity and then feeding power back in smoothly and progressively as the grip returns.

As you might imagine, it is fast too. Adjective-stretching fast. Adria’s longer straights are torn up, reeled in, devoured and expelled. Before you have time to realize what’s happening, you’re already facing the next corner, braking mark long since miss-ed. Which is why it is fortunate the car’s ceramic stoppers grab as hungrily and tirelessly as they do, helping the tires to shed the vast amounts of energy they have just helped you to pile on. It is a magical, slightly surreal experience: so much speed, so little fear. You could scare yourself senseless going far slower in other, lesser supercars.

The only question remains that of how fast. It is time to turn the car over to contributing editor Pete Albrecht and his case full of timing gear to find out. It is just possible to make a quarter-mile strip out of the start/finish straight at Adria, but it leaves precious little space to stop before meeting the hungry-looking barriers that surround the outside of the first corner. Spectacular though the experience is from inside the GT’s cockpit, it is just about equally exciting viewed from outside, as the car nudges forward until the Correvit test computer’s arm espies the reflective strip that marks the start of the run. The car pauses, the engine revs rise, Albrecht blends in the clutch and—bang!—launch, accompanied by an angry chirp of tires
and a whiff of burning rubber. Then the Carrera GT becomes a rapidly diminishing shape heading down the straight, throwing angry, pure race car noise at the concrete stands and pit buildings. First, second, third and just a brief hint of fourth gear—until, in what seems an impossibly short space of time, the run is over, distance emphasized by the one-second delay between seeing the brake lights go on and hearing the engine note die.

http://www.autoweek.com/weekart/2004/0412/porschetrack.jpg

Several runs later and we’ve got our answers, a best 0-to-60-mph of the day of 3.5 seconds, just inside Porsche’s official figure. The 0-to-100-mph figure of 7.06 seconds is just outside Porsche’s claimed 6.9 seconds for the almost-equivalent 0-to-160-km/h drag. But the quarter-mile time of 11.35 seconds, pulling a terminal of 129.5 mph, is astonishing. Remember, this thing wears license plates and passes emissions tests. The most gloriously unlikely statistic only comes later, with the full digest of the Correvit’s number-crunched statistics. The GT has the capacity to do 0 to 100 mph
and then back to rest again in just 11.6 seconds, in a distance of just 882 feet—considerably less than the length of the deck of an aircraft carrier. It is not quite as fast as a McLaren F1, 0.7 second shy to 100 mph, short by the same margin to 120 mph. But is there anything else out there that comes even close? Let’s hope Ferrari will lend us an Enzo, and Mercedes an SLR McLaren to help us find out.

Sure, by any rational standard $440,000 is a ridiculous amount to even think about paying for a car, even two or three cars. But after one day in the company of the Porsche Carrera GT, it really does begin to look dangerously like a bargain.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPECIFICATIONS


CHASSIS: Carbon fiber monocoque; rwd, two-seat roadster

POWERTRAIN: Mid-engine, 5.7-liter/350-cid dohc V10;
605 hp @ 8000 rpm, 435 lb-ft @ 5750 rpm; six-speed manual

COMPRESSION RATIO: 12.0:1

WHEELBASE, TRACK FRONT/REAR: 107.5, 63.5/62.5 inches

LENGTH/WIDTH/HEIGHT: 181.6/75.6/45.9 inches

CURB WEIGHT: 3043 pounds

SUSPENSION, FRONT AND REAR: Independent, dual control arms, coilover shocks, antiroll bar

BRAKES: 14.96-inch ceramic-composite vented discs with
six-piston calipers, front and rear; ABS

WHEELS AND TIRES: Forged magnesium wheels with
center bolt; 265/35ZR-19 front, 335/30ZR-20 rear;
Michelin Pilot Sport Radial X

FUEL CAPACITY: 24.3 gallons

CARGO: 2.7 cubic feet (front trunk)


PERFORMANCE AS TESTED *


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0-60 MPH: 3.5 sec
0-100 KM/H (62.1 MPH): 3.63 sec
0-100 MPH: 7.06 sec
0-QUARTER-MILE: 11.35 sec @ 129.5 mph
0-100 MPH-0: 11.6 sec, 882 ft
20-40 MPH (FIRST GEAR): 1.1 sec
40-60 MPH (SECOND GEAR): 1.3 sec
60-80 MPH (SECOND GEAR): 1.4 sec
60 MPH-0: 104 ft

LATERAL ACCELERATION (50-M SKIDPAD): 0.95 g

TOP SPEED: 205 mph (mfr)

Source: Auto Week

pelucidor
04-13-2004, 11:34 AM
Talk about an overly gushing review. With phrases like:

"the growing realization that “supercar” isn’t going to be a strong enough word for us here, as there is a magnitude of difference between this über Porsche and other more, well, ordinary supercars. The Carrera GT could eat any production Lamborghini for breakfast, spend the morning snacking on Aston Martins and then lunch on Ferraris. What we need here is new nomenclature, something understated, yet snappy. How about hyper-ultimate megacar?"

you have to wonder if the author has ever seen or read about an Enzo, Mclaren F1, Ford GT, Koeniggsegg, Zonda etc.

After more breathless prose and over the top praise for the Porsche's inconceivable acceleration he ends up saying that the 12 year old Mclaren F1 is faster!

camber
04-13-2004, 12:47 PM
Well in the GT's defense the F1 did cost twice as much 12 years ago too!

I'd still rather have the Porsche GT over the Enzo. The Enzo looks better in real life then in Pics but so does the GT. GT supposed to be faster then Enzo at Nurburgring too!

garak
04-13-2004, 01:36 PM
I think the Carrera GT is much cooler than the Enzo. Its also a lot cheaper. This car looks like a boxster on steroids. It is supposed to make more downforce than the Enzo, but we will have to see - I am sure some Enzo owner will put it to the test at the Ring.

Newsreporter, For once I have to say good post.

Infiniti6MT
04-13-2004, 01:53 PM
Awesome car !! I'll take Carrera GT over the seriously fugly Enzo in a sec.

BrianS
04-13-2004, 03:45 PM
To the dismay of the engineers at Porsche’s Weissach R&D facility, the LMP2000 project was pulled in November ’99 to concentrate engineering resources on the Cayenne



speaking of ripping the heart and soul out of an automotive engineer and designer, ones that probably spent their entire lives aspiring to be some small part of a porsche

NewsReporter
04-13-2004, 06:27 PM
Newsreporter, For once I have to say good post.



Plenty more coming

Nismo
04-13-2004, 07:32 PM
1. Ferrari Enzo
2. Porsche Carrera GT
3. McLaren F1
4. Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale
5. Acura NSX

http://forums.freshalloy.com/images/graemlins/cool.gif

NewsReporter
04-13-2004, 07:35 PM
1. Nissan R390
2. Nissan R390
3. Nissan Skyline GT-R(R34)
4. Toyota Supra
5. Bufori MKIII La Joya

pelucidor
04-14-2004, 10:28 AM
Well in the GT's defense the F1 did cost twice as much 12 years ago too!

I'd still rather have the Porsche GT over the Enzo. The Enzo looks better in real life then in Pics but so does the GT. GT supposed to be faster then Enzo at Nurburgring too!

Cars like the Zonda and the Koenigsegg will kill the Porshe for less money (if that is even a concern for the kind of people that can afford these cars). I think the $150k Ford GT and $375k Saleen S7 will come close in performance to the Porsche GT too.

Did you know the Koenigsegg CCR (http://www.koenigsegg.se/thecars/index.asp?submenu=4) can do the 1/4 in 9 secs at 146mph and pull over 1.3g on a skidpad? And it has a far nicer interior and more equipment than the Porsche too, for less money.

camber
04-14-2004, 11:24 AM
I think the Zonda is expensive, but both the Koenigsegg and the Zonda aren't made for worldwide safety and emission standards. Therefore, they can be made more cheaply because these small firms didn't have to worry about certifying their cars for all the different coutries of the world. The Carrera GT and Enzo did go though that process and this is one of the reasons why they do fetch a premium.

Also, Koenigeggs CCR has a sequential straight cut gear dog box compared to the dog leg transimissions and helical cut gears of the Enzo(it's a automated manual but still built like a normal dog leg transmission and not like a motorcycle sequential) and Carrera GT. If the Carrera GT had that kind of transmission it would probably be in the 9s as well. However, I think Porsche and Ferrari selected a more conventional automotive transmission because sequential racing transmissions are very difficult to drive off of FULL rpm and VERY noisy(imagine the noise of driving a conventional manual in reverse except all time.... Wholly gear whine Batman!!!)

As far speed is concerned, straghtline and skipad speed does not tell the whole picture. The figures quoted by Koenigegg for straight line and skid pad are quite close to a current Champ car but I doubt that the Koenigsegg CCR would even be close to a Champ on a road circuit.