PDA

View Full Version : Land Rover Returns to Profit


NewsReporter
09-04-2004, 05:29 AM
Land Rover has returned to profit, the FT reports, for the first time since it was bought by Ford four years ago. Its finances have been kick-started back into the black by the launch of the latest-generation Range Rover, which is a high-profit model, and the company says that the launch of the latest Discovery is expected to bring further improvement. Cost-cutting measures, such as streamlining distribution and back-office functions, are also attributed as factors. The pre-tax profit of £7.9m has made Land Rover able to inject over £100m into its struggling pensions fund for workers. Last year, Land Rover reported losses of £5m, and £302m the year before.

However, an announcement on the future of the Solihull production plant, which employs 8000 people in the Midlands, has been deferred by a week to give managers and union representatives more time to produce their plan for improving quality and productivity and reducing costs. Production of the next-generation Freelander is to be moved to Halewood, where there is spare capacity at the Jaguar plant, and Ford is threatening to move further production to the USA.

Mark Fields, the head of Ford's Premier Automotive Group, has called for Land Rover to match efficiency and quality levels at Jaguar's factories within three years, and to be the equal of other luxury car brands within five years. He told the press today: "The team has done a good job, but not good enough. If they don't deliver, the future of Solihull will be less secure. There can be no half-measures." PAG has just reported a $362m second-quarter loss, with Jaguar sales flagging.

Source: 4Car

keithg
09-04-2004, 06:38 PM
I didn't know Ford cared about build quality.

Who knew?

NewsReporter
09-04-2004, 08:41 PM
Ford should have never bought Land Rover, other than the Range Rover, there is nothing there worth buying.

M_TYPE_X
09-04-2004, 08:56 PM
Aston Martin, Jaguar, and Land Rover were questionable buys.
Volvo seems to be a success, unlike SAAB, which is hurting GM.

NewsReporter
09-04-2004, 09:06 PM
Aston Martin is a great buy, the only problem with Aston is their cars aren't really sports cars. More like vehicles that look sporty but couldn't take on Ferrari or Lambo.

Jaguar needs a beat down cause they seem to not know what their role is in the PAG. How about Ford fire all those drunk Brits at Jaguar?

in10shunz
12-28-2005, 06:13 PM
Which SUV/SUT would u most likely prefer Range Rover Super Charge or Cadillac EXT/ Escalade?. I'm thinking about buying myself a car and I can't make my decision...help!

Riffster
12-28-2005, 06:46 PM
The Range Rover is going to be the better off-roader, but is that how you're going to use it? If you're mostly going to use it on the public roads I would probably get the Escalade.

(Actually I would rather get a Land Cruiser, but that's just me.)

Sorry MTX.

- Riff

SukairainKupe
12-28-2005, 09:24 PM
There is only one reason why Land Rover is making profit now:


MTV! Celebrity Cribs "You ain't nobody 'less yougot a 'Rova,' kno' wha I'm say'n?"

M_TYPE_X
12-29-2005, 10:25 AM
The Range Rover is going to be the better off-roader, but is that how you're going to use it? If you're mostly going to use it on the public roads I would probably get the Escalade.

(Actually I would rather get a Land Cruiser, but that's just me.)

Sorry MTX.




The Land Cruiser seems to be more keeping it real than the Range Rover. I've NEVER seen a Range Rover actually go off-read before. Theoretically, I guess they're very good at it. Hey, theoretically speaking then, I'm a five-star chef. http://forums.freshalloy.com/images/graemlins/ooo.gif